From 752ca266a44613a2b505f4f81cfed38cfd8fa5d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jeanpouget-abadie <jean.pougetabadie@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:33:32 -0500
Subject: linear threshold section

---
 paper/sections/assumptions.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'paper/sections/assumptions.tex')

diff --git a/paper/sections/assumptions.tex b/paper/sections/assumptions.tex
index 14b16d4..8b7e3ee 100644
--- a/paper/sections/assumptions.tex
+++ b/paper/sections/assumptions.tex
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ As mentioned previously, it is intuitive that the irrepresentability condition i
 
 \begin{proposition}
 \label{prop:irrepresentability}
-If the irrepresentability condition holds with $\epsilon > \frac{2}{3}$, then the restricted eigenvalue condition holds with constant $\gamma_n \geq (1 - 3(1 -\epsilon))^2 \lambda_{\min}^2n/(4s)$, where $\lambda_{\min} > 0$ is the smallest eigenvalue of $Q^*_{S,S}$, on which the results of \cite{Daneshmand:2014} also depend.
+If the irrepresentability condition holds with $\epsilon > \frac{2}{3}$, then the restricted eigenvalue condition holds with constant  $\gamma_n \geq \frac{ (1 - 3(1 -\epsilon))^2 \lambda_{\min}^2}{4s}n$, where $\lambda_{\min} > 0$ is the smallest eigenvalue of $Q^*_{S,S}$, on which the results of \cite{Daneshmand:2014} also depend.
 \end{proposition}
 
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

