From b84dddecf2eab982941704a43663cf643be027d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thibaut Horel Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:01:56 -0400 Subject: Archive old code --- experiments/notes.txt | 30 ------------------------------ 1 file changed, 30 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 experiments/notes.txt (limited to 'experiments/notes.txt') diff --git a/experiments/notes.txt b/experiments/notes.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 5e54737..0000000 --- a/experiments/notes.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,30 +0,0 @@ -can find p_s ourselves — don’t need to restrict to earlier papers -cutoff at three steps vs no cutoff — compare for appendix - -how would epidemiologists approach this - -demographics — risk factors for infection -similarity — e.g. exposure to people diff age from you -gang membership as binary, also if in same gang -propensity score for beta values? -model vs model with demographics? - -goal — don’t get laughed at. just get into review and revision - -try for hybrid model -that could be a separate paper -could show more possible infections, or people who could have been infected by multiple people so involved in a cascade - -how accurate are cascades? — show scores -can cascades predict what happened - -understanding cascades can help save x lives -what percent of shootings were result of cascades -can we distinguish which ones are not -distribution cascade/individuals over time or given certain traits - -add in fatal shootings — just so it looks the same in the network -can compare which are more likely to cause infections -all we’re looking for is exposure so someone who is shot and killed can still infect a friend - -try multiple vs single infections, for people who have been shot multiple times. compare results \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2