From 7eb00cfe5a7b7a37491a7a1d8f48b0bf642136b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thibaut Horel Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 01:56:57 +0200 Subject: Comment out counter-example --- final/main.tex | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'final/main.tex') diff --git a/final/main.tex b/final/main.tex index 9e2f3f3..6f751df 100644 --- a/final/main.tex +++ b/final/main.tex @@ -541,9 +541,9 @@ constrained case: the main idea is to use induction and Lemma~\ref{lemma:marginal} to ``split'' the set of items and reduce to the induction hypothesis. -However, A. Rubinstein identifies the following counterexample to this potential approach: -\begin{counterexample}[\citep{rubinstein2},Example 4 adapted] Consider a single-item auction with a single bidder, $m$ items, with each item having an ex-ante allocation probability of $\frac{1}{m^{1/4}}$ -\end{counterexample} +% However, A. Rubinstein identifies the following counterexample to this potential approach: +% \begin{counterexample}[\citep{rubinstein2},Example 4 adapted] Consider a single-item auction with a single bidder, $m$ items, with each item having an ex-ante allocation probability of $\frac{1}{m^{1/4}}$ +% \end{counterexample} \bibliographystyle{abbrvnat} -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2