From 7eb00cfe5a7b7a37491a7a1d8f48b0bf642136b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thibaut Horel <thibaut.horel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 01:56:57 +0200
Subject: Comment out counter-example

---
 final/main.tex | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'final/main.tex')

diff --git a/final/main.tex b/final/main.tex
index 9e2f3f3..6f751df 100644
--- a/final/main.tex
+++ b/final/main.tex
@@ -541,9 +541,9 @@ constrained case: the main idea is to use induction and
 Lemma~\ref{lemma:marginal} to ``split'' the set of items and reduce to the
 induction hypothesis.
 
-However, A. Rubinstein identifies the following counterexample to this potential approach:
-\begin{counterexample}[\citep{rubinstein2},Example 4 adapted] Consider a single-item auction with a single bidder, $m$ items, with each item having an ex-ante allocation probability of $\frac{1}{m^{1/4}}$
-\end{counterexample}
+% However, A. Rubinstein identifies the following counterexample to this potential approach:
+% \begin{counterexample}[\citep{rubinstein2},Example 4 adapted] Consider a single-item auction with a single bidder, $m$ items, with each item having an ex-ante allocation probability of $\frac{1}{m^{1/4}}$
+% \end{counterexample}
 
 
 \bibliographystyle{abbrvnat}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

