From 63e4895745fc0f633074520412d0ba7820cb844d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul <Paul@Pauls-MacBook-Air.local>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:39:47 -0500
Subject: Corrected small typo

---
 project2/main.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'project2/main.tex')

diff --git a/project2/main.tex b/project2/main.tex
index 77ceb9f..c83e783 100644
--- a/project2/main.tex
+++ b/project2/main.tex
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ answer to our problem:
     \item when $\hat{x} = \left(\frac{1}{m},\ldots,\frac{1}{m}\right)$, by
         summing the constraint \eqref{eq:ea} for all $i\in[m]$, we see that the
         ex-ante allocation constraint implies that in expectation, no more than
-        one-item is sold to the agent. This is exactly the ex-ante relaxation
+        one item is sold to the agent. This is exactly the ex-ante relaxation
         of the unit-demand case for which a 2-approximation to $R\left(
         \left(\frac{1}{m},\ldots,\frac{1}{m}\right)\right)$ is already known.
 \end{itemize}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

