summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/experimental.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'experimental.tex')
-rw-r--r--experimental.tex21
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/experimental.tex b/experimental.tex
index 388e628..be1fc16 100644
--- a/experimental.tex
+++ b/experimental.tex
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ frame. For each frame where a person is detected and a skeleton is fitted we
collect the 3D coordinates of 20 body joints, and the color image recorded by
the RGB camera.
-\begin{figure}
+\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.99\textwidth]{graphics/hallway.png}
\end{center}
@@ -71,12 +71,11 @@ Head-ShoulderCenter, ShoulderCenter-Shoulder, Shoulder-Elbow, Elbow-Wrist,
ShoulderCenter-Spine, Spine-HipCenter, HipCenter-HipSide, HipSide-Knee,
Knee-Ankle. Finally, any frame with a missing feature is filtered out.
-Each detected skeleton also has an ID number which identifies which figure
-it maps to from the figure detection stage. When there are consecutive number stays the
-same across several frames, it means that the skeleton-fitting
-algorithm was able to detect the skeleton in a contiguous way. This
-allows us to define the concept of a \emph{run}: a sequence of frames
-with the same skeleton ID.
+Each detected skeleton also has an ID number which identifies the figure it
+maps to from the figure detection stage. When there are consecutive frames with
+the same ID, it means that the skeleton-fitting algorithm was able to detect
+the skeleton in a contiguous way. This allows us to define the concept of a
+\emph{run}: a sequence of frames with the same skeleton ID.
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
@@ -120,7 +119,7 @@ number of runs available for the least present people, as seen in
Table~\ref{tab:dataset}, which does not permit a proper training of
the algorithm.
-\begin{figure}
+\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.80\textwidth]{graphics/10fold-naive.pdf}
\end{center}
@@ -151,7 +150,7 @@ subsample. Figure~\ref{fig:sequential} shows the prediction-recall
curve when averaging the prediction rate of the 10 incremental
experiments.
-\begin{figure}
+\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.80\textwidth]{graphics/online-sht.pdf}
\end{center}
@@ -195,7 +194,7 @@ classification and some of runs are dropped because it is not possible
to recognize the person. Apart from that, the data set reduction is
performed exactly as explained in Section~\ref{sec:experiment-design}.
-\begin{figure}
+\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.80\textwidth]{graphics/back.pdf}
\end{center}
@@ -244,7 +243,7 @@ Figure~\ref{fig:var} compares the Precision-Recall curve of
Figure~\ref{fig:sequential} to the curve of the same experiment run on
the newly obtained data set.
-\begin{figure}
+\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.80\textwidth]{graphics/var.pdf}
\end{center}