1 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/experimental.tex b/experimental.tex
index fde1395..f59be72 100644
--- a/experimental.tex
+++ b/experimental.tex
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ happens if the noise from the Kinect is reduced.
   \begin{center}
     \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{graphics/frames.pdf}
   \end{center}
-  \vspace{-1.5\baselineskip}
   \caption{Distribution of the frequency of each individual in the
   dataset}
   \label{fig:frames}
@@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ we reach 90\% accuracy at 60\% recall for a group size of 10 people.
   \caption{Results with 10-fold cross-validation for the top $n_p$ most present people}
 \label{fig:offline}
 \end{center}
-  \vspace{-1.5\baselineskip}
 \end{figure*}
 
 %\begin{figure}[t]
@@ -251,7 +249,6 @@ recognition rates mostly above 90\% for group sizes of 3 and 5.
 \begin{center}
     \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{graphics/online-sht.pdf}
 \end{center}
-\vspace{-1.5\baselineskip}
     \caption{Results for the online setting, where $n_p$ is the size of
     the group as in Figure~\ref{fig:offline}}
     \label{fig:online}
@@ -260,7 +257,6 @@ recognition rates mostly above 90\% for group sizes of 3 and 5.
   \begin{center}
     \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{graphics/face.pdf}
   \end{center}
-\vspace{-1.5\baselineskip}
   \caption{Results for face recognition versus skeleton recognition
   with $n_p=5$ people}
   \label{fig:face}
@@ -297,7 +293,6 @@ less than 10\% at most thresholds.
 \begin{center}
   \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{graphics/back.pdf}
 \end{center}
-\vspace{-1.5\baselineskip}
 \caption{Results with people walking away from and toward the camera}
 \label{fig:back}
 \end{figure}
@@ -305,7 +300,6 @@ less than 10\% at most thresholds.
 \begin{center}
   \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{graphics/var.pdf}
 \end{center}
-\vspace{-1.5\baselineskip}
 \caption{Results with and without halving the variance of the noise}
 \label{fig:var}
 \end{figure}