summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/uniqueness.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'uniqueness.tex')
-rw-r--r--uniqueness.tex10
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/uniqueness.tex b/uniqueness.tex
index 429e7de..3c23f7a 100644
--- a/uniqueness.tex
+++ b/uniqueness.tex
@@ -1,6 +1,16 @@
\section{Skeleton uniqueness}
\label{sec:uniqueness}
+\begin{figure*}[t]
+ \centering
+ \includegraphics[width=0.99\textwidth]{graphics/limbs.pdf}
+ \caption{Histograms of differences between 9 skeleton measurements
+ $x_k$ (Section~\ref{sec:experiment}) and their expectation given the
+ class $y$. In red, the p.d.f. of a normal distribution with mean and
+ variance equal to the empirical mean and variance of the measurement}
+ \label{fig:error marginals}
+\end{figure*}
+
The most obvious concern raised by trying to use skeleton measurements as a
recognizable biometric is their uniqueness. Are skeletons consistently and
sufficiently distinct to use them for person recognition?