summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/approximation.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'approximation.tex')
-rw-r--r--approximation.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/approximation.tex b/approximation.tex
index 81a6d0c..23dc212 100644
--- a/approximation.tex
+++ b/approximation.tex
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ problem with a constant approximation ratio to \EDP{}
(Proposition~\ref{prop:relaxation}) and then showing how to approximately solve
this problem in a monotone way.
-\subsection{A concave relaxation of \EDP}\label{sec:concave}
+\subsection{A Concave Relaxation of \EDP}\label{sec:concave}
A classical way of relaxing combinatorial optimization problems is
\emph{relaxing by expectation}, using the so-called \emph{multi-linear}
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ proposition which is also proved in the Appendix.
$L^*_c \leq 2 OPT + 2\max_{i\in\mathcal{N}}V(i)$.
\end{proposition}
-\subsection{Solving a convex problem monotonously}\label{sec:monotonicity}
+\subsection{Solving a Convex Problem Monotonously}\label{sec:monotonicity}
Note, that the feasible set in Problem~\eqref{eq:primal} increases (for the
inclusion) when the cost decreases. As a consequence, $c\mapsto L^*_c$ is