From e92f1202263bcbb19a83cce559cf0fb53e3537bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thibaut Horel <thibaut.horel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:08:29 -0700
Subject: Conform to STOC format for proof.tex

---
 proof.tex | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

(limited to 'proof.tex')

diff --git a/proof.tex b/proof.tex
index de8eb82..af8bbb2 100644
--- a/proof.tex
+++ b/proof.tex
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
-\documentclass{IEEEtran}
-%\usepackage{mathptmx}
+\documentclass{acm_proc_article-sp}
 \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
-\usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,amsfonts}
+\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
 \usepackage{algorithm}
 \usepackage{algpseudocode}
 \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
@@ -320,7 +319,6 @@ We will consider two relaxations of the value function $V$ over $\mathcal{N}$:
         & \geq \frac{\log\big(1+\frac{\kappa}{\sigma^2}\big)}{2\frac{\kappa}{\sigma^2}}
         \partial_i L_\mathcal{N}(\lambda)
     \end{align*}
-
 \end{proof}
 
 \begin{lemma}
@@ -361,7 +359,6 @@ We will consider two relaxations of the value function $V$ over $\mathcal{N}$:
     \end{equation}
 
     Putting \eqref{eq:e1} and \eqref{eq:e2} together gives the results.
-
 \end{proof}
 
 \begin{algorithm}
@@ -443,7 +440,6 @@ The mechanism is budget feasible.
         OPT(V, \mathcal{N}, B) \leq \frac{e}{e-1}\left( 3 + \frac{12e}{C\cdot
         C_\kappa(e-1) -5e  +1}\right) V(S_M)
     \end{displaymath}
-
 \end{proof}
 
 \begin{theorem}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

