From 134ab1e3da0b83cfd332776c603178b43a091ba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thibaut Horel <thibaut.horel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:13:18 +0100
Subject: Fix references

---
 related.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'related.tex')

diff --git a/related.tex b/related.tex
index f61abc4..6b1ab99 100644
--- a/related.tex
+++ b/related.tex
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ McSherry and Talwar \cite{mcsherrytalwar} argue that \emph{differentially privat
 simultaneously achieve exact truthfulness as well as differential privacy. Eliciting private data through a \emph{survey} \cite{roth-liggett}, whereby individuals first decide whether to participate in the survey and then report their data,
  also fall under the unverified database setting \cite{xiao:privacy-truthfulness}. Our work differs from the above works in that it does not capture user utility through differential privacy; crucially, we also assume that experiments conducted are \emph{tamper-proof}, and individuals can missreport their costs but not their values.
 
-Our work is closest to Roth and Schoenebeck \cite{roth-shoenebeck}, who also consider how to sample individuals from a population to obtain an unbiased estimate of a reported value. The authors assume a prior on the joint distribution
+Our work is closest to Roth and Schoenebeck \cite{roth-schoenebeck}, who also consider how to sample individuals from a population to obtain an unbiased estimate of a reported value. The authors assume a prior on the joint distribution
 \stratis{to be continued}
 
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

