diff options
| author | Thibaut Horel <thibaut.horel@gmail.com> | 2015-08-30 01:56:57 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thibaut Horel <thibaut.horel@gmail.com> | 2015-08-30 01:56:57 +0200 |
| commit | 7eb00cfe5a7b7a37491a7a1d8f48b0bf642136b3 (patch) | |
| tree | 591c8f30519390ca09087f35026e71aec552644c /final | |
| parent | 3c3d9ff1f0c76e1a859ad8a582fe79a12dbb7920 (diff) | |
| download | econ2099-7eb00cfe5a7b7a37491a7a1d8f48b0bf642136b3.tar.gz | |
Comment out counter-example
Diffstat (limited to 'final')
| -rw-r--r-- | final/main.tex | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/final/main.tex b/final/main.tex index 9e2f3f3..6f751df 100644 --- a/final/main.tex +++ b/final/main.tex @@ -541,9 +541,9 @@ constrained case: the main idea is to use induction and Lemma~\ref{lemma:marginal} to ``split'' the set of items and reduce to the induction hypothesis. -However, A. Rubinstein identifies the following counterexample to this potential approach: -\begin{counterexample}[\citep{rubinstein2},Example 4 adapted] Consider a single-item auction with a single bidder, $m$ items, with each item having an ex-ante allocation probability of $\frac{1}{m^{1/4}}$ -\end{counterexample} +% However, A. Rubinstein identifies the following counterexample to this potential approach: +% \begin{counterexample}[\citep{rubinstein2},Example 4 adapted] Consider a single-item auction with a single bidder, $m$ items, with each item having an ex-ante allocation probability of $\frac{1}{m^{1/4}}$ +% \end{counterexample} \bibliographystyle{abbrvnat} |
