summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/project
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThibaut Horel <thibaut.horel@gmail.com>2014-11-02 18:01:36 -0500
committerThibaut Horel <thibaut.horel@gmail.com>2014-11-02 18:01:36 -0500
commit754124df59526f86a3bafce5f2eef9e9fd4314b1 (patch)
treea1b28dc7ce7b3411d486bad4b7fb7c9dd3cda824 /project
parent2158e19d2d7e0e569815a0f8ba8b4176593fd5d3 (diff)
downloadecon2099-754124df59526f86a3bafce5f2eef9e9fd4314b1.tar.gz
Add beginning of section 2
Diffstat (limited to 'project')
-rw-r--r--project/main.tex24
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/project/main.tex b/project/main.tex
index 84ca28b..69d3f24 100644
--- a/project/main.tex
+++ b/project/main.tex
@@ -55,10 +55,32 @@ We believe that this framework, while inspired by eBay auctions, also has applic
Therefore, our goal is as follows:
-\begin{goal} To define a formal model for an eBay-style ascending first-price auction with a reserve price and a \lq\lq Buy It Now\rq\rq option, relate it to prior work on dynamic (time-dependent) auctions, analyze its properties and equilibria, and attempt to find a simpler approximation model.\end{goal}
+\begin{goal} To define a formal model for an eBay-style ascending first-price
+auction with a reserve price and a \lq\lq Buy It Now\rq\rq option, relate it to
+prior work on dynamic (time-dependent) auctions, analyze its properties and
+equilibria, and attempt to find a simpler auction which approximates it.\end{goal}
\section{Desiderata for Model}
+In order to formalize the setting we are interested in studying, we need to
+make some assumptions on the behaviors of the agents. Finding the right
+behavioral axioms is part of the project, but we list a few natural candidates
+that we are planning to consider:
+\begin{itemize}
+ \item each bidder not only has a utility function that expresses his utility at the
+ end of the auction, but also maintains a distribution on the
+ probability of being allocated.
+ \item at each time step, the bidders update their distribution based on
+ what has been observed at the previous step (hence the bidders'
+ distribution are a function of the past history up to this point)
+ \item at each time step, bidders place in order to maximize a function
+ which is increasing in the probability of being allocated and their
+ utility: contrary to
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+
+
\section{Relevant Prior Work}
\end{document}