summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/abstract.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStratis Ioannidis <stratis@Stratiss-MacBook-Air.local>2013-09-22 07:55:14 +0200
committerStratis Ioannidis <stratis@Stratiss-MacBook-Air.local>2013-09-22 07:55:14 +0200
commitcc1eea524d8fd1314d85fe7b56cddd95fd75302d (patch)
tree8d028b58c801d7263e2457e5cf9934e279b51e70 /abstract.txt
parent1cb6e4b28e77b8c1a87e54bbd7097d7f8af0e371 (diff)
parent50900bfc44961b87379cd2d3464b677d9f5be1ac (diff)
downloadrecommendation-cc1eea524d8fd1314d85fe7b56cddd95fd75302d.tar.gz
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://74.95.195.229:1444/git/data_value
Diffstat (limited to 'abstract.txt')
-rw-r--r--abstract.txt28
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/abstract.txt b/abstract.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9078926
--- /dev/null
+++ b/abstract.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+In the classical experimental design setting, an experimenter E has access to
+a population of n potential experiment subjects each associated
+with a vector of features x_i. Conducting an experiment with subject i
+reveals an unknown value y_i E. E typically assumes some hypothetical
+relationship between x_i and y_i, e.g., y_i = β*x_i, and estimates β from
+experiments, e.g., through linear regression. As a proxy for various practical
+constraints, E may select only a subset of subjects on which to conduct the
+experiment.
+
+We initiate the study of budgeted mechanisms for experimental design. In
+this setting, E has a budget B. Each subject i declares an associated cost
+c_i to be part of the experiment, and must be paid at least her cost. In
+particular, the Experimental Design Problem (EDP) is to find a set S of subjects
+for the experiment that maximizes V(S) = log det(I_d + \sum_{i\in S} x_i x_i^T )
+under the constraint \sum_{i\in S} c_i ≤ B; our objective function corresponds to the information
+gain in parameter β that is learned through linear regression methods, and
+is related to the so-called D-optimality criterion. Further, the subjects are
+strategic and may lie about their costs. Thus, we need to design a mechanism
+for EDP with suitable properties.
+
+We present a deterministic, polynomial time, budget feasible mechanism
+scheme, that is approximately truthful and yields a constant (= 12.98) factor
+approximation to EDP. By applying previous work on budget feasible mechanisms
+with a submodular objective, one could only have derived either an
+exponential time deterministic mechanism or a randomized polynomial time
+mechanism. We also establish that no truthful, budget-feasible mechanism is
+possible within a factor 2 approximation, and show how to generalize our approach
+to a wide class of learning problems, beyond linear regression.