intro related

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/related.tex b/related.tex
index 84d0762..811b440 100644
--- a/related.tex
+++ b/related.tex
@@ -17,7 +17,12 @@ full-information setup, Chen \emph{et al.},~propose a truthful, $8.34$-approxima
 
 
 \paragraph{Budget Feasible Mechanism Design on Specific Problems}
-Improved bounds, as well as deterministic polynomial mechanisms, are known for specific submodular objectives. For symmetric submodular functions, a truthful mechanism with approximation ratio 2 is known, and this ratio is tight \cite{singer-mechanisms}. Singer also provides a 7.32-approximate truthful mechanism for the budget feasible version of \textsc{Matching}, and a corresponding lower bound of 2 \cite{singer-mechanisms}. Improving an earlier result by Singer, \citeN{chen} give a truthful, $2+\sqrt{2}$-approximate mechanism for \textsc{Knapsack}, and a lower bound of $1+\sqrt{2}$. Finally, a truthful, 31-approximate  mechanism is also known for the budgeted version of \textsc{Coverage} \cite{singer-influence}. Our results therefore add \SEDP{} to the set of problems for which a deterministic, polynomial time, constant approximation mechanism is known.
+Improved bounds, as well as deterministic polynomial mechanisms, are known for specific submodular objectives. For symmetric submodular functions, a truthful mechanism with approximation ratio 2 is known, and this ratio is tight \cite{singer-mechanisms}. Singer also provides a 7.32-approximate truthful mechanism for the budget feasible version of \textsc{Matching}, and a corresponding lower bound of 2 \cite{singer-mechanisms}. Improving an earlier result by Singer, \citeN{chen} give a truthful, $2+\sqrt{2}$-approximate mechanism for \textsc{Knapsack}, and a lower bound of $1+\sqrt{2}$. Finally, a truthful, 31-approximate  mechanism is also known for the budgeted version of \textsc{Coverage} \cite{singer-influence}. 
+
+The above deterministic mechanisms for \textsc{Knapsack} \cite{chen} and \textsc{Coverage} \cite{singer-influence} follow the same general framework, which we also employ. We describe this framework in detail in Section~\ref{sec:main}. Both of these mechanisms rely on approximating the optimal solution to the underlying combinatorial problem by a well-known LP relaxation~\cite{pipage}, which can be solved exactly in polynomial time. No such  relaxation exists for \EDP, whose logarithmic objective is unlikely to be approximable through an LP. We develop instead a convex relaxation to \EDP; though, contrary to the above LP relaxations, this cannot be solved exactly, we establish that it can incorporated in the framework of \cite{chen,singer-influence} to yield a $\delta$-truthful mechanism for \EDP.  
+
+
+%Our results therefore add \SEDP{} to the set of problems for which a deterministic, polynomial time, constant approximation mechanism is known.
 
 \paragraph{Beyond Submodular Objectives}
 Beyond submodular objectives, it is known that no truthful mechanism with approximation ratio smaller than $n^{1/2-\epsilon}$ exists for maximizing  fractionally subadditive functions (a class that includes submodular functions) assuming access to a value query oracle~\cite{singer-mechanisms}. Assuming access to a stronger oracle (the \emph{demand} oracle), there exists